Awareness without fear

Teach the mechanism, not just the warning.

Instead of memorising a long list of suspicious signs, participants learn how common attacks are constructed.

  • What is the attacker trying to achieve?
  • Why does the request feel believable?
  • Which parts are designed to create urgency or authority?
  • Which information made the message convincing?
  • Where should verification happen?
  • What would stop the attack without stopping normal work?

That creates judgement people can use outside the training room.

Built around your organisation.

Generic examples have their place. They should not be the whole session.

Where appropriate, we spend time understanding the organisation before training begins.

That can include reviewing relevant public information about:

  • Leadership and public-facing staff
  • Organisational roles
  • Public documents
  • Suppliers and partners
  • Events and announcements
  • Common communication channels
  • Relevant approval processes
  • Public digital exposure

We use that context to build realistic examples without exposing unnecessary personal information.

What a session can cover.

Content is chosen around the audience and the organisation. Topics can include:

Phishing
How targeted and mass phishing differ, what modern phishing looks like and how to verify where a request is actually taking you.
Executive impersonation
How authority, urgency and publicly available information can make fake instructions believable.
Payment and supplier fraud
How legitimate relationships can be used as context for changed payment details and fraudulent requests.
WhatsApp and new-number scams
How familiar names, profile photos and organisational context are used to create trust.
Credential theft
Why fake login pages work and what practical checks can interrupt the process.
AI-assisted social engineering
How generative AI can improve language, personalisation and scale without making every message impossible to recognise.
Voice cloning and synthetic media
Why a familiar voice or face should not be the only proof behind a sensitive instruction.
Verification
How call-backs, known contact details, second channels and clear approval rules reduce uncertainty.
Public exposure
How ordinary information about people and organisations contributes context to targeted attacks.
Reporting
What to do when something feels wrong, including when to stop, verify and escalate.

Interactive, not passive.

Training should require decisions.

Sessions can include:

  • Scenario discussions
  • Message analysis
  • Verification exercises
  • Role-specific examples
  • Short group exercises
  • Optional simulations
  • Questions based on real organisational concerns

The objective is not to catch people out.

It is to improve what they do next time.

Optional exposure work.

Training explains the decisions people make.

An Exposure Assessment explains what an outsider can learn before approaching them.

Organisations can combine the two where appropriate.

That allows training scenarios to be informed by actual exposure instead of entirely fictional examples.

Explore Exposure Assessments

What we do not provide.

Security Awareness Training does not provide:

  • Compliance certification
  • Audit opinions
  • Penetration testing
  • Access to staff accounts
  • Monitoring of employees
  • Public naming and shaming of people who make mistakes

Where simulations are used, reporting arrangements are agreed before they begin.

Make the training relevant to the room.

Tell us who the audience is, what concerns you and what your people deal with day to day.